2017 Mazda CX-9: True Cost, Problems & Verdict

61 NHTSA owner complaints · 0 recalls · data-computed verdict. No opinions — public data only.

Mazda CX-9

Editor's note

Avoid the 2011 and 2012 CX-9, CAUTION verdicts at 65 and 50 with Service Brakes accounting for 100 of the 2011 car's 170 complaints and 143 of the 2012 car's 221; buy a 2014, 2015, 2017 or any year from 2019 to 2022, which score between 83 and 93. The 2018 car is a CAUTION at 57 with 126 complaints, 74 of them Engine. Read the full note on the model page. 2017 specifically: a year the record favours — 61 complaints, score 89/100. The caveats in the note apply to other years of this nameplate more than to this one.

Read the guide

Used Mazda CX-9, CX-3 and CX-7: what the record says, including 2017 — written and signed by Adir Trabelsi, 2026-09-16.

Owner complaints: 61 filed with NHTSA

Complaints per year on the road: 6.78

Engine43Unknown Or Other9Fuel/Propulsion System6Power Train4Suspension4Steering2

What owners say

Verbatim reports filed with the United States safety regulator (NHTSA) by owners of this exact model year. Public record.

this is covered under csp11. the problem is my car is a 2017 and they only allow a warranty up to 120,000 miles mine is at 158000 and they will not fix the problem now even thought we just started having problems.
Engine running rough. Check Engine Light illumination. Difficulty starting or a no-start condition. Noticeable loss of power during acceleration Check engine light P0192
The car was jump start due to a bad battery it cold and the light was left on. Right after the jump start a check engine light can on. When I put the vehicle in drive to turn the steering wheel it violently snapped bad and broken one of my finger nail. I tried aging in disbelief it happened aging this shouldn't be happening it could've broke my fingers.

Recalls: 0 campaigns

CampaignComponentSummary

What it costs to buy — and what owning it really takes

Class-level estimates, priced as a mid-size SUV of its model year, re-priced to your country. Not a quote, not a valuation of one specific car — condition, mileage and options move it. How these are computed.

Typical price today $17,900–$25,700 used market, 2026
You lose to depreciation $1,500/year $7,500 over five years
Price when new (2017)$31,800
Worth in five years$14,300
Depreciation, five years$7,500
Insurance, five years$6,750–$9,550
Fuel and maintenance, five years$23,042
Five-year cost of owning it$38,692
Per mile driven, at 12,000 miles a year$0.64

What it costs to run

EPA combined 24 MPG · estimated annual fuel cost $2,550

Fuel (your region)$2,550
Maintenance band (your region) $1,196–$2,361
Estimated running cost this year (age 9) $4,328
Range across the maintenance band $3,746–$4,911
Next five years, running cost $23,042

Re-priced automatically from your country's retail fuel, electricity and parts indices — change country in the bar at the top. Estimates; see methodology.

02468101214$6,021vehicle age (years)
fuel/energy + maintenance band, annual — US dollars, estimate

Run your own numbers in the true-cost calculator →

What this car's problems cost to fix

Ranked by the components owners of this exact model year actually complain about. Each figure is flat-rate labour hours x the local shop rate plus a parts band — an estimate of what this kind of failure costs, not a quote, and not a prediction that this car will need it. Formula.

  • Engine43 complaints · typical job: Cooling-system or timing-drive repair (6.0 h labour + parts)$1,040–$2,220
  • Unknown Or Other9 complaints · typical job: Diagnosis and mixed repair (2.0 h labour + parts)$360–$940
  • Fuel/Propulsion System6 complaints · typical job: Fuel pump or injector replacement (3.5 h labour + parts)$680–$1,620
  • Power Train4 complaints · typical job: Transmission service or clutch-pack repair (7.0 h labour + parts)$1,290–$4,040
  • Suspension4 complaints · typical job: Struts, springs and control-arm bushings, one axle (4.0 h labour + parts)$780–$1,580
  • Steering2 complaints · typical job: Electric power-steering rack or column motor replacement (5.0 h labour + parts)$1,020–$2,500

FAQ

What is the most common problem with the 2017 Mazda CX-9?

The most-reported issue in NHTSA complaint data is Engine (43 complaints in our indexed sample).

Is the 2017 Mazda CX-9 a good used car to buy?

Our data verdict is BUY with a reliability score of 89/100, computed from 61 NHTSA complaints and 0 recall campaigns. See the verdict card for the top reasons.

How much does it cost to fix the 2017 Mazda CX-9's most common problem?

43 of the NHTSA complaints filed against the 2017 Mazda CX-9 sit in the Engine group — more than any other component on this model year. The representative job there is cooling-system or timing-drive repair: about 6.0 hours of labour plus parts, roughly $1,040–$2,220 at a US independent shop and re-priced to your country at the top of the page. It is an estimate of what this class of failure costs, not a quote for this car.

What does a 2017 Mazda CX-9 cost to run per year?

About $4,608 a year in fuel or energy plus the maintenance band — roughly $23,042 over five years, before purchase price, insurance and depreciation. Figures come from available EPA fuel-economy data and industry maintenance averages, and are re-priced to your country.

What will a 2017 Mazda CX-9 really cost YOU per year?

Fuel, maintenance band and depreciation — computed from public data in 10 seconds.

Open the true-cost calculator

Data sources

Complaints & recalls: NHTSA · Fuel economy: EPA fueleconomy.gov · Scoring: our published methodology.
Maintenance bands are industry-average estimates (AAA Your Driving Costs, CarMD index) — labeled estimates, not measurements. Last updated: 2026-10-04.

89RELIABILITY / 100
BUY

Moderate evidence — 61 complaints, 0 recalls on record

Typical price today$17,900–$25,700used market estimate · the full money picture
Running cost, next 5 years$23,042fuel/energy + maintenance band midpoint · estimate
  • 61 NHTSA complaints on record (6.8/yr of exposure) — in line with a typical year of this model (7.6/yr)
  • 0 recall campaigns, 0 touching safety-critical systems

How this score is computed →